Management Submodel

Introduction

WEPS is expected to reflect effects of various management practices upon wind erosion. The diversity of current practices applied to cropland by land managers makes this a daunting task. However, WEPS must adequately simulate typical cultural practices to accurately assess their affects upon wind erosion control. The MANAGEMENT submodel is assigned the task of handling the cultural practices applied by land managers which affect the soil/surface "state" within WEPS.

Purpose

All cultural practices applied by land managers are by definition "human initiated". These human-controlled processes affecting the soil and field surface "state" are initiated by typical management practices such as tillage operations, planting, harvesting, irrigation, etc. Therefore, the purpose of the MANAGEMENT submodel is to model what are considered the majorhuman-controllable actions that can affect the "system state" within WEPS, in particular the system state variables defining the temporal soil and surface conditions.

Objectives

The MANAGEMENT submodel objectives are:

  1. To model the primary human-initiated processes that can affect a site's susceptibility to wind erosion.
  2. To provide the framework necessary to process a list of specified human-initiated actions, i.e., the cultural practices applied to a field such as a tillage/crop rotation sequence.

Keeping with the WEPS philosophy, The MANAGEMENT submodel simulates processes via a physical basis if possible, incorporates the conservation of mass and energy concepts, and uses a minimum number of parameters with readily available and/or attainable values.

Assumptions and Limitations

Several assumptions and limitations have been imposed on the MANAGEMENT submodel. The reasons vary from simply limiting the scope of the submodel, to inadequate knowledge of specific processes that may have a significant impact on the soil and/or surface. Here is the list of current assumptions and limitations, provided in no particular order, that impact the MANAGEMENT submodel.

  1. Total soil water content within the current tillage zone is assumed to be unaffected by a tillage operation. The HYDROLOGY submodel is expected to handle changes in surface water content and therefore appropriately represent the usual rapid drying of the surface layer following tillage.
  2. Tillage speed is not included as an independent variable affecting how a tillage operation modifies the soil and surface. A "typical" tillage speed is assumed for each tillage operation upon which the affects upon the soil and surface are based. Future versions of the MANAGEMENT submodel may incorporate tillage speed if sufficient data becomes available to model its effects upon the soil and surface.
  3. Tillage depth is assumed to not influence how a tillage operation affects the soil and surface except for determining which soil layers are directly affected by a tillage operation. Again, the MANAGEMENT submodel may be extended to incorporate tillage depth effects if sufficient data becomes available in the future.
  4. Effects of tillage operations on soil layers below the tillage depth are not considered, i.e., subsoil compaction below the tillage zone due to tillage. This will be addressed in a future release of the MANAGEMENT submodel.
  5. Effects of a management operation are assumed homogeneous within a subregion. Effects due to tractor tires will not be considered. Certain zone-related tillage operations, such as row cultivator, will be treated in a manner such that the result will be "averaged" or "equivalent" values which represent the homogeneous region.
  6. Emergency tillage, for wind erosion prevention or control, and strip cropping practices is considered in WEPS by specifying multiple separate, non-contiguous homogeneous subregions.
  7. Ridge and dike geometric specifications (oriented roughness) will be provided by the user. If the tillage depth specified is not sufficient to create or destroy them (for a particular tillage operation that does so), the MANAGEMENT submodel will modify the tillage depth accordingly to obtain the desired ridge and/or dike specifications. Tillage operations that do not modify the current ridge and/or dike specifications will not do so (i.e., ridge tillage equipment).
  8. Soil tillage depths will be adjusted to the nearest soil layer boundary. This will ensure that the most recent tillage operation modifications on the soil "state" are adequately represented. In the future, soil layer boundaries may be adjusted appropriately to accommodate tillage depths that would split a soil layer, i.e., a new layer boundary would be created at the prescribed tillage depth.
  9. Aggregate stability and aggregate density are assumed to be unaffected by tillage operations. This decision is based on limited field data analysis. Future research may provide statistically significant affects that could then be modeled. These properties may still change among soil layers within the tillage zone due to aggregate mixing among layers caused by tillage operations.

Submodel Description

The approach taken within the MANAGEMENT submodel to deal with the variety of land management actions was to:

  1. Identify the primary physical processes involved.
  2. Represent individual management operations as a sequence of those primary physical processes.
  3. Develop a MANAGEMENT file format allowing the input of user-specified sequences of management operations, i.e., a management practices/crop rotation file.

All operations modeled within the MANAGEMENT submodel fall within the following defined management categories.

Operation Class Description
Primary Tillage
Tillage performed to primarily reduce surface residue, increase short-term infiltration rates, loosen subsoil hardpans, and control weed growth. Usually after-harvest tillage operations fall in this category.
Secondary Tillage
Tillage typically performed in preparation for seeding or planting operations. Usually these operations are intended to smooth the soil surface, reduce the average aggregate size, and control weed growth if present.
Cultivation
Tillage specifically designed to eliminate weed growth after crop germination.
Planting/Seeding
Operations required to plant or seed a crop into a field.
Harvesting
Operation to remove biomass from a field. Biomass removed may be grain, root material, or the entire above ground biomass.
Irrigation
The artificial application or addition of water to the soil.
Fertilization
The application or addition of specific nutrients to a soil.
Burning
The removal of surface biomass with fire.
Grazing
The removal of surface biomass via livestock.

When a management or tillage operation is performed, it is simulated through a group of individual physical processes that represent the total effects of that operation. The basic individual physical processes to be modeled within the MANAGEMENT submodel of WEPS have been grouped according to the target of their actions and outlined in Table 1.

Table 1. MANAGEMENT submodel processes.
Action Process Description
Soil Mass Manipulation Crush The application of forces to the soil to modify the soil aggregate structure by breaking down soil aggregates.
Loosen/
Compact
The process of decreasing soil bulk density and increasing porosity (incorporation of air) or the inverse process of increasing soil bulk density by removing air from the soil.
Mix The process of uniting or blending of soil layer properties, including biomass.
Invert The reversing of the vertical order of occurrence of soil layers within the current specified tillage zone.
Surface Manipulation Ridge/Dike The process of creating or destroying ridges and/or dikes (oriented surface roughness).
Roughen The process of modifying the random surface roughness.
Crust The process of modifying the soil surface crust characteristics.
Biomass Manipulation Bury/Lift The process of moving above ground biomass into the soil or the inverse process of bringing buried biomass to the surface.
Cut The process of cutting standing biomass to a prescribed height.
Drop The process of moving a portion of the standing biomass to the soil surface.
Kill The death of live biomass.
Remove The removal of biomass from the system (harvest, grazing, and burning).
Soil Amendments Fertilize Addition of nutrients to the soil.
Plant Addition of seeds/plants to the soil.
Irrigate Addition of water to the soil.

The underlying philosophy behind the MANAGEMENT submodel was to attempt to develop physical law based representations, if possible, for each of the chosen physical processes. These processes are assumed to be independent with respect to each other and are to be simulated sequentially, even though many of them occur simultaneously in the real world. The order they are initiated in the submodel is dependent upon the specific operation.

The list of management operations performed for a given management plan (crop rotation or cyclical management practices) on a homogeneous region (subregion) is specified in a MANAGEMENT input file. The MANAGEMENT submodel checks on a daily basis for any operations to be performed on that day. If operations are needed, the MANAGEMENT submodel will execute the specified routines required to simulate the effects of those operations as instructed in the MANAGEMENT input file. When the last operation is performed for that particular crop rotation cycle, the same sequence will be repeated for the next year(s) of simulation.

A single MANAGEMENT input file may include multiple management operation lists, one for each subregion being simulated.