Wheat, winter, CMZ 50 lo ppt, 16-18 in spac plantpop 220.0 dmaxshoot 8.0 cbaflag 1 tgtyield 60 cbafact 1 cyrafact 1.0 hyldflag 0 hyldunits bu/ac hyldwater 10.9 hyconfact 148.7 idc 5 grf 0.8 ck 0.6 hui0 0.8 hmx 1.2 growdepth 0.025 rdmx 2.0 tbas 0.0 topt 25.0 thudf 1 dtm 270 thum 1800.0 frsx1 -5.0 frsx2 -15.0 frsy1 0.005 frsy2 0.05 verndel 0.035 bceff 30.0 a_lf 0.013 b_lf 0.8013 c_lf 0.4293 d_lf -0.086 a_rp -0.018 b_rp 0.932 c_rp 0.556 d_rp 0.0736 a_ht 0.3293 b_ht -0.086 ssaa 2.87 ssab 1.0 sla 20.0 huie 0.05 transf 0 diammax 0.3 storeinit 28.571428 mshoot 335.0 leafstem 1.4 fshoot 0.012 leaf2stor 0.1 stem2stor 0.1 stor2stor 0.0 rbc 2 standdk 0.0133 surfdk 0.0133 burieddk 0.0133 rootdk 0.0133 stemnodk 0.04 stemdia 0.0050 thrddys 17.1 covfact 5.227942 resevapa -2.08165 resevapb 0.548606 yield_coefficient 1.1111 residue_intercept 0.11208501 regrow_location 0.0 noparam3 0.0 noparam2 0.0 noparam1 0.0 crop_notes This is the same as wheat, winter, soft white in WEPS for use in CMZ 50 and 32, 49 and 51 where similar climate exists. Calibrated at 40 yield. MAS 5/4/06 Standing Fall rate reduced from 0.12 to 0.04 #/(# days) because WW-Chem fallow in SW KS showed too much standing residue was falling down. Larry Wagner recommended we reduce fall rate. Dave L, Linda S., and I made runs to get the wt to match the standing stalk wt from Fred Fox stalk residue samples WERU Lab. This rate left 24% of the starting count standing. This is well within the range of values of two paper. Both paper showed about 46% left standing at the 440 day after harvest time. David Nelson, ARS Akron, CO also confirmed that the orginal 8% standing was too low. He thought that the 24% was much more resonable. MAS 6-7-11 crop_devnotes Enter dev notes here.