\documentclass[10pt,letterpaper, final]{report} % \documentclass{} required in all files

\usepackage{../preamble/myWEPS} % This is now our single preamble file inclusion (it assumes a “.sty” file extension)


\begin{document}


The Tabular Detail Report screen (\cref{fig:Tabular_Detail_Report_window}) is a date ordered list of parameters generated by the WEPS model. The Tabular Detail Report can be accessed by clicking the Tablular Detail Report button {\scalerel*{\includegraphics{images/icons/ReportD.png}}{\strut} on the Main or Run Summary screens as well as through the ViewOutput menu. At the top of the Tabular Detail Report window is a button bar that allows the user to close the window {\scalerel*{\includegraphics{images/icons/closebutton.png}}{\strut}, print the data {\scalerel*{\includegraphics{images/icons/print.png}}{\strut}, or view other summary reports via the toolbar buttons.

\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.7]{images/Conservation_Planning/outputsumNew.jpg}
\caption{Tabular Detail Report window.}
\label{fig:Tabular_Detail_Report_window}
\end{figure}

Since this report contains large amounts of information, a method is provided to select smaller portions of information to view. Below the menu bar is a drop down list labeled \textbf{Select Report}. 

Clicking the down arrow {\scalerel*{\includegraphics{images/icons/down_arrow.png}}{\strut} to the right displays a list of reports that are subsets of all data available. This allows the user to pick a smaller, easier to view, subset of the complete report. The \textbf{Output Details} is the most comprehensive report and is displayed by default for most WEPS configurations. Note that the NRCS configured version of WEPS defaults to the \textbf{Erosion \& Crop Veg, Res \& Biomass (details)} report.

The following section outlines the content of the Output Details portion of the Detail Reports screen and describes how they can be used to interpret results and design management systems to control erosion by wind. The WEPS User Guide section titled “Interface Reference: Output” contains the definition of each row and column in the Tabular Detail report.

\subsection{Date} \label{subsec:Date}

This column contains the start and end date of the period for which the row information is reported (start day-end day, month, rotation year). Items in each row represent values from the end of the previous period to the current date (unless the parameter only makes sense for a specific date, then it represents the value on the ending date). The date column, along with soil loss, will indicate which periods have the greatest wind erosion and are thus in need of changes of management to control wind erosion.

The number of \textbf{rows} in the Output Details screen differ, depending on the number of cropping years in the rotation and the number of management operations in each year of the rotation. Each year of the rotation has regular output displayed for either fifteen day periods (1st of month to 14th and 15th to the end of the month) or from the date of an operation to the end of the regular period. Occasional reporting from the date of a management operation are reported since operations can change field conditions. This output allows the user to view the erosion and other output for each year of the rotation. At the end of each year in the rotation is a row that contains the average annual value for that rotation year. The last row in the output form contains the average annual values for the complete crop rotation.

\subsection{Operation} \label{subsec:Operation}

This column contains the management operation that occurred on the specified date (start date of the listed period). It is the management operation or the date of operation that most users will modify to affect field conditions and thus wind erosion.

\subsection{Crop} \label{subsec:Crop}

This column lists the name of the crop planted on the date shown (start date of the listed period). Crop is another choice the land manager may change to control wind erosion. Crops that produce substantial residue (e.g., corn or small grain) will tend to lower the erosion rate if the residue is managed properly.

\subsection{Wind Erosion} \label{subsec:Wind Erosion}

The Wind Erosion columns provide a summary of all the wind erosion soil loss for the simulation run. The numbers in these columns are those that the user will try to affect by adjusting 
management dates and operations. If an erosion event occurred, but values generated by the model are too small to be displayed on the output table (i.e., ${>}$  0.001 kg/m$^2$ or 0.00455 tons/acre), then the amount is listed as “trace”. If amounts are too large to be accurately displayed then, the amount is listed simply as greater than a specified amount (i.e., ${>}$ 300 kg/m$^2$ or 1338 tons/acre). In these cases, erosion amounts are so large that they are generally considered unacceptable. The simulated absolute values are usually not relevant in such scenarios anyway (the model’s accuracy is also questionable at these high erosion rates because they are outside the erosion levels the model has been validated against).

\begin{itemize}

\item{\textul{Number and Loss per Erosion Event} -- These columns give the user an indication of the frequency and severity of erosion events. Some periods will have numerous events while others may have one, or even none. One event may have severe erosion while many others may have only slight erosion totaling less erosion than another single event.}

\item{\textul{Average Total Gross Soil Loss} -- This column contain the gross erosion within the field, averaged across the field, as well as averaged over the number of simulation years in each rotation year (kg/m$^2$ or tons/acre).}


\item{\textul{Net Soil Loss from Field} -- These columns contain net soil loss from the field averaged over the number of simulation years in each rotation year (kg/m2 or tons/acre). Some deposition within a field can occur, especially 
when barriers are present downwind. Net soil loss is the amount of gross loss minus deposition. \textbf{Average Total} is the average total net loss from the field, \textbf{Average Creep and Saltation} is the average creep plus saltation net loss from the field, \textbf{Average Suspension} is the average suspension net loss from the field, and \textbf{Average PM10} is the average PM10 (particulate matter less than 10 microns) net loss from the field.}

\end{itemize}

\subsection{Mass Passing Indicated Field Boundary} \label{subsec:Mass Passing Indicated Field Boundary}

These columns {\scalerel*{\includegraphics{images/icons/outs5.png}}{\strut} contain the mass per unit length of various-sized material that passed the field boundary for each direction (kg/m or tons/1000 ft). This information is useful in determining how much material is leaving the field in each direction. For the \textbf{Creep+Saltation} size, the material will most likely be deposited on the field boundary, such as a stream, fence, ditch, or road. If deposited in a ditch, subsequent rainfall may wash the material into waterways, where it can affect water quality. If deposited on a roadway, the roadway will likely need to be cleared. For \textbf{Suspension} and \textbf{PM10} sizes, the material may travel great distances, affecting air quality and possibly visibility, especially on nearby roadways. The material passing each boundary may indicate that barriers may be needed on the opposite or upwind side of the field to control wind erosion. The direction of soil loss may also indicate a needed change in the direction of tillage.


\subsection{Within Field Wind Erosion Activity} \label{subsec:Within Field Wind Erosion Activity}

 The information in these columns is useful in determining how much of the field is actively eroding and how much is not, which may impact what control measures, if any, should be applied and where. This information is also useful in understanding to what extent the field is actively eroding and thus causing plant or soil damage, or how much is subject to burial. Finally, this information is useful in understanding how much of the field is contributing to overall (net) field loss. Acres indicate the size of the eroding area and the fraction is the proportion of the field eroding.
 
\subsection{Weather Information} \label{subsec:Weather Information}

The Weather columns provide a summary of some of the weather information for the simulation run and help the user understand which periods are erosive and why.

\begin{itemize}

\item{\textul{Average Total Precip.} -- This column contains the total precipitation for the period, averaged over the simulation years in each year of the crop rotation (mm or inches). This section is useful in determining how precipitation amounts may be affecting biomass production as well as residue and surface
roughness decay.}

\item{\textul{Average Wind Energy ${>}$ 8m/s (18 miles/hour)} -- This column contains the average daily wind energy for the period for winds greater than 8 m/s (~18 mph), averaged over the simulation years in each year of the crop rotation (KJ/day). This will indicate which periods have the most erosive winds.}

\item{\textul{Snow Depth ${>}$ 20 mm (~0.75 in)} -- Fractions of the field covered with snow greater than 20 mm (~0.75 in) deep are considered non-erodible.}

\end{itemize}

\subsection{Crop and Soil Water Information} \label{subsec:Crop and Soil Water Information}

The Crop and Soil Water columns provide a summary of important crop and soil water data for the simulation and help the user understand the amount of water available during specific periods and where it is going (crop growth, storage, runoff, etc.).

\begin{itemize}

\item{\textul{Irrigation} -- This column provides the amount of irrigation water applied during the specified period in mm or inches.}

\item{\textul{Runoff and Drainage} -- These columns provide the amounts of water lost due to surface runoff and drainage for the specified period in mm or inches. Reducing these losses usually will result in higher yields and biomass crop production, which tends to reduce a field’s susceptibility to wind erosion if managed correctly.}

\item{\textul{Soil Water} -- This column provides the amount water stored in the soil at the end of the specified period in mm or inches. The amount of stored water available during the crop growing season affects a crop’s susceptibility to droughty conditions.}

\item{\textul{Soil Water} -- This column provides the amount water stored in the soil at the end of the specified period in mm or inches. The amount of stored water available during the crop growing season affects a crop’s susceptibility to droughty conditions.}

\item{\textul{Soil Surface Evaporation} -- This column provides the amount of water lost to evaporation for the specified period in mm or inches. Reducing the amount of surface evaporation, for example with additional residue retained on the surface, will usually mean more water for the crop and thus, indirectly reduce wind erosion susceptibility.}


\item{\textul{Plant Transpiration} -- This column provides the amount of water that has transpired in the growing crop for the specified period in mm or inches.}

\end{itemize}

\subsection{Average Biomass Surface Conditions on Date} \label{subsec:Average Biomass Surface Conditions on Date}

The Average Surface Biomass Conditions on Date columns provide a summary of average surface conditions, including crop biomass and soil roughness, for the simulation run on the ending date of the period.

\begin{itemize}

\item{\textul{Crop Vegetation (Live)} -- These columns provide information on the structural configuration of live growing biomass. By observing the canopy cover, the standing silhouette area index, and the above-ground mass, the user can determine which periods are not providing sufficient cover to control wind erosion.}

\item{\textul{Crop Residue (Dead)} -- These columns provide information on the structural configuration of dead biomass or residue. By observing the flat cover, the standing silhouette area index, the flat mass, and the standing mass, the user can determine which periods are not providing sufficient residue cover to control wind erosion.}

\item{\textul{Live and Dead Biomass} -- These columns provide information on the structural configuration of both the live growing biomass and the dead biomass or residue. By observing the flat cover, the standing silhouette area index, the flat mass, and the standing mass, the user can determine which periods are not providing sufficient cover to control wind erosion.}

\end{itemize}

\subsection{Average Soil Surface Conditions on Date} \label{subsec:Average Soil Surface Conditions on Date}

The Average Soil Surface Conditions on Date columns provide a summary of average soil surface conditions for the simulation run on the ending date of the period.

\begin{itemize}

\item{\textul{Roughness} -- For cropping systems that do not produce sufficient residue for erosion control (e.g., cotton and most vegetable crops), roughness management is often used to reduce wind surface friction velocity at the soil surface. This reduces the amount of soil detachment and transport and increases deposition and thus reduces soil loss.}

\begin{itemize}

\item{\textit{Oriented Roughness} -- Oriented roughness is also known as ridge roughness. These columns refer to regularly spaced roughness elements caused by tillage implements such as ridges, furrows and dikes. Ridge 
orientation, width, and height may be adjusted for periods of high soil loss to determine its effect on wind erosion. The user can also follow the roughness decay over time as a result of rainfall or wind erosion.}

\item{\textit{Random Roughness} -- This column contains soil surface random roughness, defined as the standard deviation of the elevation from a plane across a tilled area. Random roughness does not take into account oriented roughness. Random roughness is the value at the period end, averaged over the simulation years in each rotation year (inches or mm). Random roughness is primarily the result of aggregate size distribution, but is also affected by various types of tillage tools. Random roughness values for typical field operations are listed in Table 15.1. Photographs (Figure 15.2 through Figure 15.10) can 
be used as a guide to determine relative random roughness values. These photos were taken at an oblique angle to provide an image similar to that seen by an observer standing a few feet from the plot.}

\end{itemize}

\item{\textul{Aggregation} -- Soil aggregate size and aggregate dry stability affect erosion by wind. Soil aggregates less than 0.84 mm (0.03 inches) in diameter are generally considered to be erodible and so the higher the fraction of aggregates ${<}$ 0.84mm, the more erodible the surface. Dry stability is related to abrasion resistance where harder, more stable aggregates result in a lower erodibility of the soil. The larger the dry stability value (ln(J/m$^2$)), the more resistant the aggregates to abrasion and erosion by wind.}

\item{\textul{Crust Cover} -- A soil crust will resist abrasion and erosion more than a loose, finely divided soil surface. In general, the more of the surface is covered by a crust, the less erosion occurs. Crusts are transient and generally represent a degraded soil quality, and therefore, crusts should not be relied upon to control erosion by wind. But a greater crust cover may explain a lesser erosion amount that would normally be expected.}

\end{itemize}



\begin{table}[H]
\centering

\sisetup{
	round-mode		= places, 					%% Rounds numbers
	round-precision	= 1, % to x (1) places		%% Overides the default settings here
}

\begin{tabular}{|l|S||l|S|}
\hline
\textbf{Field}		 & \textbf{Random Roughness} & \textbf{Field}		& \textbf{Random Roughness}\\
\textbf{Operations}	 & \textbf{(inches)}		 &	\textbf{Operations}	& \textbf{(inches)}\\
\hline
Chisel, sweeps			& 1.2	& Fertilizer applicator, anhydrous knife	& 0.6\\
Chisel, straight point	& 1.5	& Harrow, spike								& 0.4\\
Chisel, twisted shovels	& 1.9	& Harrow, tine								& 0.4\\
Cultivator, field		& 0.7	& Lister									& 0.8\\
Cultivator, row			& 0.7	& Manure injector							& 1.5\\
Cultivator, ridge till	& 0.7	& Moldboard plow							& 1.9\\
Disk, 1-way				& 1.2	& Mulch threader							& 0.4\\
Disk, heavy plowing		& 1.9	& Planter, no-till							& 0.4\\
Disk, Tandem			& 0.8	& Planter, row								& 0.4\\
Drill, double disk		& 0.4	& Rodweeder									& 0.4\\
Drill, deep furrow		& 0.5	& Rotary hoe								& 0.4\\
Drill, no-till			& 0.4	& Vee ripper								& 1.2\\
Drill, no-till into sod	& 0.3	& 											&\\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\caption{Random roughness values for typical management operations, based on a silt loam soil (from USDA Agriculture Handbook 537 and National Agronomy Manual 703, Table 5-5).}
\label{table:Operation_RR}
\end{table}

\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr1-25.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 0.25 inches (6mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_0.25_inches_(6mm)}
\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr2-65.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 0.40 inches (10 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_0.40_inches_(10 mm)}
\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr8-40.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 0.65 inches (17 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_0.65_inches_(17 mm)}
\end{figure}



\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr6-75.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 0.75 inches (19 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_0.75_inches_(19 mm)}
\end{figure}



\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr5-85.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 0.85 inches (22 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_0.85_inches_(22 mm)}
\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr9_1-05.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 1.05 inches (27 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_1.05_inches_(27 mm)}
\end{figure}



\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr7_1-60.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 1.60 inches (41 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_1.60_inches_(41 mm)}
\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=0.9]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr3_1-70.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 1.70 inches (43 mm).}
\label{fig:Random roughness of 1.70 inches (43 mm)}
\end{figure}


\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
	\includegraphics[scale=1]{images/Conservation_Planning/rr4a_2-15.jpg}
\caption{Random roughness of 2.15 inches (55 mm).}
\label{fig:Random_roughness_of_2.15_inches_(55 mm)}
\end{figure}

\end{document}
